Author: Renze Steenhuisen
Date: 02:41:28 07/13/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 13, 2005 at 05:27:06, Uri Blass wrote: >On July 13, 2005 at 04:07:47, Peter Kappler wrote: > >> >>[D] 8/6k1/1P3p2/5P2/8/5b2/7K/8 w - - 0 80 >> >>It's 3am and I'm certainly tired enough to have missed something subtle, but I >>think this is a very simple draw for White. I'd like to know if there is any >>engine that can see this *without* tablebases. >> >>Oh, and if you do have this 6-piece tablebase, could you please confirm that it >>is a draw? :) >> >>-Peter > >Fruit see a score of exactly 2.32 pawns for black at depthes 13-43 >I think that the fact that the score is not changed means that it is a draw so >it is easy to understand from Fruit's output that it is a draw. My program evaluates this position as 2.5 pawn for black until it changes its mind at depth 8, and concludes it is a draw. Doesn't Fruit do that? >Note that this position only proves that the search of programs is poor because >with good search they could easily get 100 plies and see that it is a draw. > >Uri Renze Steenhuisen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.