Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: About the Sense -or non sense- of Stonewalling to Survive a Computer

Author: Dan Honeycutt

Date: 22:20:47 07/15/05

Go up one level in this thread

Hi Fernando

Up to about Sargon II, I could beat the engines.  So I played like you.  Sargon
was not bad tactically, but played a pitiful endgame.  I played right into its
strengths and avoided exploiting its weaknesses.

Now it's different.  If an engine somehow manages to screw up the opening bad
enough to lose to me, it better never play that line again.  If it does, it is
going to lose the exact same game.  I show them no mercy.

Best
Dan H.

• Re: About the Sense -or non sense- of Stonewalling to Survive a Computer Madhavan 00:50:13 07/16/05
  • Re: About the Sense -or non sense- of Stonewalling to Survive a Computer Dan Honeycutt 04:18:09 07/16/05
    • Re: About the Sense -or non sense- of Stonewalling to Survive a Computer Madhavan 04:53:48 07/16/05
      • Re: About the Sense -or non sense- of Stonewalling to Survive a Computer Dan Honeycutt 14:00:13 07/16/05

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.