Author: Madhavan
Date: 04:53:48 07/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 16, 2005 at 07:18:09, Dan Honeycutt wrote: >On July 16, 2005 at 03:50:13, Madhavan wrote: > >>On July 16, 2005 at 01:20:47, Dan Honeycutt wrote: >> >>>Hi Fernando >>> >>>Up to about Sargon II, I could beat the engines. So I played like you. Sargon >>>was not bad tactically, but played a pitiful endgame. I played right into its >>>strengths and avoided exploiting its weaknesses. >> >>Sargon is the old OLD DOS progam right?Is it available for download somewhere? > >Right. I don't know of any place where you can download it. Amazing!Sargon even entered the famous wikipedia reference. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sargon_(chess) http://www.pmpro.com/consumer/consumer/games/sargon.html It costs 24$?? >> >>>Now it's different. If an engine somehow manages to screw up the opening bad >>>enough to lose to me, it better never play that line again. If it does, it is >>>going to lose the exact same game. I show them no mercy. >> >>hmmm.what rating do you estimate? >> > >Who? Me, Sargon, or some other engine that I beat once in a blue moon? Sargon I mean,also you :) >>>Best >>>Dan H.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.