Author: Jonas Cohonas
Date: 03:13:01 07/17/05
Go up one level in this thread
>>>So, anybody can test in a different way as they wish, but to claim that system >>>is better or replacing the SSDF system is pure nonsense! Of course it cannot replace the SSDF, they use different conditions, but they can replace the interest as they get more games and update more frequently. >No, it is not unless you have an hardware 3 times faster on both computers. >If you let your computer play without giving enough time per move it may will >not find the correct moves out of book, so it will perform worst. Actually i think that 40/40 is just as interesting, different, but interesting. We get two lists with tests at different time controls, i think that is great. >>I >>would have thought most users do not have the time to play a game at 40/2h. > >I can understand this. Most users don't even have time for 40/40 :) Actually if you should make a rating list using time controls that was the most useful to the general user, i think that we are almost talking blitz here. Jonas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.