Author: Sandro Necchi
Date: 03:56:22 07/17/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 17, 2005 at 06:13:01, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>>>So, anybody can test in a different way as they wish, but to claim that system >>>>is better or replacing the SSDF system is pure nonsense! > >Of course it cannot replace the SSDF, they use different conditions, but they >can replace the interest as they get more games and update more frequently. > >>No, it is not unless you have an hardware 3 times faster on both computers. >>If you let your computer play without giving enough time per move it may will >>not find the correct moves out of book, so it will perform worst. > >Actually i think that 40/40 is just as interesting, different, but interesting. >We get two lists with tests at different time controls, i think that is great. > >>>I >>>would have thought most users do not have the time to play a game at 40/2h. >> >>I can understand this. > >Most users don't even have time for 40/40 :) >Actually if you should make a rating list using time controls that was the most >useful to the general user, i think that we are almost talking blitz here. > >Jonas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.