Author: Graham Banks
Date: 17:35:12 07/17/05
Go up one level in this thread
Hi Sandro, whereas I have always held the SSDF rating list in high regard, I get a much more accurate picture of relative strength through looking at ALL testing that is done. Most results are consistent with each other no matter what and this is what counts. You always hear the argument that results mean nothing unless you've played hundreds of games, but to be honest the results of tournaments involving 40+ rounds or matches involving 20+ games very rarely throw up unexpected results. The implementation of correct books, pondering off/on, learning off/on, time controls, EGTBs and hardware differences don't seem to make as much difference as you make out. This is not a criticism of SSDF or yourself. It's just the way I see it. Regards, Graham.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.