Author: gerold daniels
Date: 05:09:56 07/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 18, 2005 at 07:49:35, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On July 18, 2005 at 07:37:21, Kurt Utzinger wrote: > >> I see no relation between the game posted >> and GM Svidler -:( or have I missed something. >> And furthermore a personal remark: FRC is of >> no interest for me in the sense that the classic >> chess seems complicate enough -:) Why play an even >> more complex chess ?? >> Kurt > > >There is no relation whatsover, forget the game that I posted. What I am simply >saying is that Svidler is too much for BaronFrc on a single P4 processor, the >best match would be Shredder-Frc vs Peter Svidler. And as far as playing a more >complex game than standard chess; it is not really more complex you are simply >taking away all the opening's preparation and making it more exciting. > >Jorge Good morning Jorge. Would be nice if you set-up some testing for all the frc engines and see try to set up a rating list of your own. thanks for the games you have run so far. Good luck, Gerold. P.S. Just my personal opinion I think FRC is much more complex than chassical chess :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.