Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: RE: Fruit 2.1

Author: George Speight

Date: 11:39:38 07/18/05


To all those people out there running matches between Shredder 9 and Fruit- hope
i can save u some time and trouble. Regardless of any rating lists u see, and im
not sure about shredder 9, it is a statistical fact that by running thousands of
games between shredder 8, fritz 8 and Fruit 2.1, in the end they will line up as
follows: 1. shredder8   2. Fritz8   3. Fruit 2.1.  Any other result, and u had
better check ur variables, because u are doing something wrong. Kurt is right
when he says 20 games doesnt tell alot. What does make fruit 2.1 so interesting
is the fact that it is FREE. I admit if it sold for $40 it wouldnt have peaked
my interest as much as it does. But it just cant stay with shredder 8 and fritz
8 in the long run. Ive run over 5000 games, and it just wont happen. Must admit
here that the only top program i dont own is Junior 9, so i really cant say how
it would fit in that mix. But my guess is it would come in no. 2 behind
Shredder8.   One interesting note here. I have run fritz 8 and shredder 8 thru
hundreds of games online on pogo and yahoo in NONRATED games ag. humans. When i
downloaded fruit 2.1, i did the same with it. It is very interesting that it
seems to do better ag. human competition than shredder or fritz. If u really
want to see run some tests where the outcome is in doubt, forget all the rating
lists from people with agendas and download ProDeo 1.1 and List 512. Run your
matches between those 2 and Fruit 2.1. They are free also. u may be shocked at
the outcome u get.  Later, Bud



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.