Author: Günther Simon
Date: 14:28:51 07/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 18, 2005 at 15:05:55, WAEL DEEB wrote:
>Hi,
>One thing that I agree for sure:Pro Deo is a monster....
>At a long time control....2 hours per game on a decent hardware it crashed the
>two Shredders in the on going calibration of my rating list....
>Even though the shredders were using the iBase+.abk under Arena....an extreamly
>optimized and created by the help of Deep Shredder 9!
>
>Pro Deo 1.1 6/8 without a single loss!!!!
>Deep Shredder 9.0 Necromancer[a personality of mine] 3,5/8
>Deep Shredder 9.0 Int[The default settings] 2,5/8
>
>Of course a few games to make big conclutions,but still....
>
>
>
>
>
>[Event "Rating List_repositioning"]
>[Site "?"]
>[Date "2005.07.17"]
>[Round "3"]
>[White "Pro Deo 1.1"]
>[Black "Deep Shredder 9.0 Int"]
>[Result "1-0"]
>[ECO "B08"]
>[Opening "Pirc"]
>[Time "07:44:23"]
>[Variation "Classical, 5.Be2 O-O 6.O-O Bg4 7.Be3 Nc6 8.Qd2"]
>[TimeControl "7200+0"]
>[Termination "normal"]
>[PlyCount "107"]
>[WhiteType "program"]
>[BlackType "program"]
>
>1.e4 g6 2.d4 Bg7 3.Nf3 d6 4.Nc3 Nf6 5.Be2 O-O 6.O-O Bg4 7.Be3 Nfd7 8.Qd2
>{+0.50/13} c5 {-0.57/17} 9.d5 {+0.51/14} Nb6 {-0.73/17} 10.b3 {+0.55/15} Bxf3
>{-0.71/17}
>11.Bxf3 {+0.57/12} N6d7 {-0.69/17} 12.Bh6 {+0.60/14} Bxh6 {-0.89/17} 13.Qxh6
>{+0.60/13}
>Qb6 {-0.87/17} 14.Rae1 {+0.85/13} c4 {-1.10/17} 15.bxc4 {+0.95/14} Ne5
>{-0.79/16}
>16.Be2 {+1.03/14} Nbd7 {-0.92/16} 17.Reb1 {+0.95/14} Qc7 {-0.80/16} 18.Rb4
>{+1.07/14}
>b6 {-0.84/16} 19.Rfb1 {+1.15/13} Rfd8 {-0.96/15} 20.Kh1 {+1.14/13} Qc5
>{-0.84/17}
>21.Nd1 {+1.09/14} Nf6 {-0.94/16} 22.f3 {+1.04/14} e6 {-0.94/15} 23.R1b2
>{+1.05/12}
>Rde8 {-0.86/15} 24.R4b5 {+1.03/12} Qa3 {-0.86/15} 25.c3 {+1.07/11} Rac8
>{-0.86/16}
>26.R5b3 {+0.98/12} Qa5 {-0.88/17} 27.R3b4 {+0.96/13} Qc5 {-0.86/16} 28.Ra4
>{+0.95/11}
>Qc7 {-0.76/15} 29.Rd2 {+0.79/12} Qd7 {-0.70/15} 30.Rb4 {+0.75/14} Qe7 {-0.79/15}
>31.a3 {+0.69/12} Nh5 {-0.34/15} 32.g4 {+0.64/12} Nf6 {-0.76/15} 33.Ne3
>{+0.60/12}
>Ned7 {-0.68/14} 34.Rbb2 {+0.69/12} Nc5 {-0.53/14} 35.Bd1 {+0.44/12} Nfd7
>{-0.21/14}
>36.h3 {+0.33/11} Ne5 {+0.63/15} 37.Be2 {+0.23/11} f5 {+0.36/16} 38.dxe6
>{-0.34/12}
>fxe4 {+0.39/16} 39.f4 {+0.08/12} Ned3 {-0.15/16} 40.Bxd3 {-0.27/6} Nxd3
>{-0.15/10}
>41.Rxd3 {+0.11/11} exd3 {-0.15/13} 42.f5 {+0.21/12} Rc6 {-0.15/8} 43.Nd5
>{+1.29/12} Qf8
>{-0.27/8} 44.Qf4 {+1.78/11} b5 {-4.25/16} 45.cxb5 {+2.16/5} Rc5 {-4.01/15} 46.c4
>{+2.98/11} Rxd5 {-4.36/15} 47.cxd5 {+3.03/10} Qf6 {-4.78/15} 48.Rf2 {+3.20/11}
>Rc8
>{-4.93/14} 49.Kg2 {+3.37/10} Rf8 {-5.19/13} 50.Qxd6 {+4.10/10} g5 {-7.22/12}
>51.Qc7
>{+5.71/11} Qd4 {-8.99/12} 52.f6 {+6.88/11} Rxf6 {-10.37/14} 53.Qd8+ {+6.72/11}
>Kg7
>{-9.53/15} 54.Qxf6+ {+7.35/12} {1-0 Arena Adjudication} 1-0
>
>
Hi Wael,
Something must have been wrong in the end of the above game,
if you take a look at the strange depths between move 40 and 50.
Guenther
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.