Author: Uri Blass
Date: 18:42:59 07/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 18, 2005 at 06:05:30, Joachim Rang wrote: >On July 17, 2005 at 13:49:00, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On July 17, 2005 at 13:18:16, Joachim Rang wrote: >> >>>On July 17, 2005 at 12:17:23, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>> Pick the winner on both of this matches >>>> >>>> >>>> Peter Svidler vs The Baron-Frc, and Zoltan Almasi vs Shredder-Frc. The >>>>exhibition matches will be played just before the Chess960 World Championship in >>>>Mainz, on August 10, at the location of the Chess960 WCC. Time control will be >>>>25min plus 10 sec increment, 2 games. As a novelty, both programs will play >>>>without tablebases. The games will be played on standard single processor P4s. >>>> >>>>Jorge >>> >>>Svidler-Baron: 0,5-1.5 >>>Almasi-Shredder: 0-2 >>> >>>not really interesting... >> >>What about Svidler vs Shredder-Frc ? >>Almasi vs Baronn FRC ? >> >>PS: Would those be interesting matches? >>Jorge > > >no given the circumstances. > >Why I think both GM will loose badly: > >1. This is rapid chess - a big advantage for any program Any proof for it? This was the situation in the past when programs had bad branching factor but when programs have better branching factor they earn more from time relative to old programs. I would like to see a proof that today GM's can do better against top programs at slower time control. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.