Author: Dan Ellwein
Date: 20:38:53 07/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 18, 2005 at 19:28:40, Dann Corbit wrote: >On July 18, 2005 at 18:24:25, Dan Ellwein wrote: > >>[d]r4rk1/p5p1/2pqp2p/1p2R3/3PQ3/2P5/1R3PPP/6K1 b - - 0 23 >> >>P3/850 - CMX(default) ...Qd7 29 minutes >> >>Time Depth Score Positions Moves >>---- ---- ---- ---- ---- >>0:00 1/3 -0.14 720 23...Qa3 24.Qc2 Qe7 >>0:00 1/3 -0.14 720 23...Qa3 24.Qc2 Qe7 >>0:00 1/4 -0.02 4067 23...Qa3 24.Qc2 a5 25.Rxe6 >>0:00 1/5 -0.11 12995 23...Qa3 24.Qc2 Rae8 25.Ra2 Qe7 >>0:00 1/6 -0.33 35364 23...Qa3 24.Qc2 a5 25.Rc5 Ra6 26.Rb1 >> >>0:01 2/7 0.05 96083 23...Qa3 24.Rb1 Rac8 25.Qe3 Qa2 >> 26.Re1 Rce8 >>0:01 2/7 -0.03 141825 23...Rfe8 24.Re2 a5 25.Rc5 Rec8 >> 26.Qg6 Rd8 >>0:04 2/8 -0.11 368139 23...Rfe8 24.Re2 a5 25.Qg6 a4 26.Re1 >> Re7 27.R5e2 >>0:11 2/9 -0.16 971178 23...Rfe8 24.Re2 a5 25.Qg6 a4 26.Re1 >> Re7 27.R5e2 c5 >>0:31 3/10 -0.12 2669074 23...Rfe8 24.f4 a5 25.Rf2 Ra7 26.f5 >> Rae7 27.f6 Rf7 28.Qg4 >>1:21 3/11 -0.17 6991038 23...Rfe8 24.f4 a5 25.Rf2 a4 26.f5 >> a3 27.f6 Ra7 28.Qg4 c5 29.Rxc5 >>3:04 3/12 -0.17 16532111 23...Rfe8 24.f4 a5 25.Rf2 a4 26.f5 >> a3 27.f6 Ra7 28.Qg4 c5 29.Rxc5 >>3:54 3/12 -0.24 20910548 23...Qa3 24.Rb1 Qxc3 25.Rc5 Qd2 >> 26.Rc2 Qf4 27.Qxe6+ Kh7 28.Qxc6 >> Qxd4 29.Qxb5 Rab8 30.Qf1 Rxb1 31.Qxb1 >> >>10:12 4/13 -0.15 54663066 23...Qa3 24.Qc2 a5 25.Rc5 a4 26.Qb1 >> e5 27.Rxc6 exd4 28.Rxb5 dxc3 29.Rb7 >> Rf7 >>15:30 4/13 -0.24 82295930 23...Rfe8 24.f4 a5 25.f5 Qa3 26.Rc2 >> Qa1+ 27.Kf2 Qb1 28.Rxe6 Kf8 29.Re2 >> Qxe4 30.R2xe4 Rxe6 31.fxe6 >>29:06 4/13 -0.27 159507535 23...Qd7 24.Re2 Rae8 25.Kf1 a5 >> 26.Rc5 e5 27.dxe5 Re6 28.Qd4 Qd8 >> 29.Qxd8 Rxd8 30.f4 > >Why do you think that move is best? > >It is only .03 pawn better than the previous iteration. good point, Dann, I was a little hasty in my use of the exclamation point... Dan
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.