Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: test position... black to move... how many programs find Qd7!...

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 20:48:50 07/18/05

Go up one level in this thread


On July 18, 2005 at 23:38:53, Dan Ellwein wrote:

>On July 18, 2005 at 19:28:40, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
>>On July 18, 2005 at 18:24:25, Dan Ellwein wrote:
>>
>>>[d]r4rk1/p5p1/2pqp2p/1p2R3/3PQ3/2P5/1R3PPP/6K1 b - - 0 23
>>>
>>>P3/850 - CMX(default) ...Qd7 29 minutes
>>>
>>>Time	Depth	Score	Positions	Moves
>>>----	----	----	----		----
>>>0:00	1/3	-0.14	720		23...Qa3 24.Qc2 Qe7
>>>0:00	1/3	-0.14	720		23...Qa3 24.Qc2 Qe7
>>>0:00	1/4	-0.02	4067		23...Qa3 24.Qc2 a5 25.Rxe6
>>>0:00	1/5	-0.11	12995		23...Qa3 24.Qc2 Rae8 25.Ra2 Qe7
>>>0:00	1/6	-0.33	35364		23...Qa3 24.Qc2 a5 25.Rc5 Ra6 26.Rb1
>>>
>>>0:01	2/7	0.05	96083		23...Qa3 24.Rb1 Rac8 25.Qe3 Qa2
>>>					26.Re1 Rce8
>>>0:01	2/7	-0.03	141825		23...Rfe8 24.Re2 a5 25.Rc5 Rec8
>>>					26.Qg6 Rd8
>>>0:04	2/8	-0.11	368139		23...Rfe8 24.Re2 a5 25.Qg6 a4 26.Re1
>>>					Re7 27.R5e2
>>>0:11	2/9	-0.16	971178		23...Rfe8 24.Re2 a5 25.Qg6 a4 26.Re1
>>>					Re7 27.R5e2 c5
>>>0:31	3/10	-0.12	2669074		23...Rfe8 24.f4 a5 25.Rf2 Ra7 26.f5
>>>					Rae7 27.f6 Rf7 28.Qg4
>>>1:21	3/11	-0.17	6991038		23...Rfe8 24.f4 a5 25.Rf2 a4 26.f5
>>>					a3 27.f6 Ra7 28.Qg4 c5 29.Rxc5
>>>3:04	3/12	-0.17	16532111	23...Rfe8 24.f4 a5 25.Rf2 a4 26.f5
>>>					a3 27.f6 Ra7 28.Qg4 c5 29.Rxc5
>>>3:54	3/12	-0.24	20910548	23...Qa3 24.Rb1 Qxc3 25.Rc5 Qd2
>>>					26.Rc2 Qf4 27.Qxe6+ Kh7 28.Qxc6
>>>					Qxd4 29.Qxb5 Rab8 30.Qf1 Rxb1 31.Qxb1
>>>
>>>10:12	4/13	-0.15	54663066	23...Qa3 24.Qc2 a5 25.Rc5 a4 26.Qb1
>>>					e5 27.Rxc6 exd4 28.Rxb5 dxc3 29.Rb7
>>>					Rf7
>>>15:30	4/13	-0.24	82295930	23...Rfe8 24.f4 a5 25.f5 Qa3 26.Rc2
>>>					Qa1+ 27.Kf2 Qb1 28.Rxe6 Kf8 29.Re2
>>>					Qxe4 30.R2xe4 Rxe6 31.fxe6
>>>29:06	4/13	-0.27	159507535	23...Qd7 24.Re2 Rae8 25.Kf1 a5
>>>					26.Rc5 e5 27.dxe5 Re6 28.Qd4 Qd8
>>>					29.Qxd8 Rxd8 30.f4
>>
>>Why do you think that move is best?
>>
>>It is only .03 pawn better than the previous iteration.
>
>good point, Dann, I was a little hasty in my use of the exclamation point...

It looks to me like this position is very close to even, and that there are
several good candidate moves.

But a real chess expert could probably help out here.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.