Author: Jonas Cohonas
Date: 02:49:30 07/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
>I do not think that there is a design to get benefit from being x times faster >but there is a design that make advantage of the ability to be 100 times faster >in task 1 and not faster in task 2. Not when the design is hardware? (cfpga) >> >>It is not "all processors" i bet you that most strong engines would not have any >>problems beating GNU chess running 200 mln pos/s, in other words the "engine" >>needs to be strong in the first place, i think if you took Shredder and ran it >>at 200 mln pos/s it would be as strong as Hydra ;) >> >>Jonas > >I think that we have no proof that Shredder of today is not stronger than hydra. Maybe not, but a very strong indication, i am sure most experts would hold Hydra as a favorite in a match between the two.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.