Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 17:24:41 02/18/99
Go up one level in this thread
On February 18, 1999 at 19:19:13, Fernando Villegas wrote: >On February 18, 1999 at 15:00:33, Mike Cummings wrote: > >>So how does Zarkov 4.2 stack up against other engines for analysis? This appears >>to be the strongest engine CA 4.0 has for internal analysis, and I wondered how >>strong it really is. I haven't been able to find much comment on this on the >>web. >> >>-Chucklebug >>-(not Micheal Cummings) > > >I have heard or readen right here that Z 4,2 is an strong program -which are not >these days?- but not in the very top league, perhaps an step behind or, if you >wish, half an step under them. That seems to be 2450 or so >Fernando I'm playing a lot of winboard games at home against zarkov. version 4.5d nowadays. zarkov4.5c and 4.5d are really strong. the zarkov in genius extends way more than these. I think John should sell those 4.5c and 4.5d too. They kick butt. Vincent
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.