Author: Anson T J
Date: 14:58:48 07/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 19, 2005 at 17:05:50, Andreas Guettinger wrote: >On July 19, 2005 at 16:34:57, Anson T J wrote: > >>As all threads don't calculate the same, the NPS is a fair enough measurement. >>I'm more interested in the NPS than time to depth. > >??? > >Like Joachim already mentioned, this makes absolutely no sense to measure the >speedup of dual vs single processor version in nps. >It's like to measure the ELO in nps. Or measure the weigth of a car in miles per >hour. Or measuring if an engine scales better on an Intel or AMD chip based on the NPS given that its the same engine? I appreciate your helpful advice but I am really interested in the NPS mainly as I'm looking to see which dual cpus offer a better scaling factor. This way is also much easier for people to do. If you would like to do 10+ tests and post the NPS and time-to-depth please be my guest. Its a lot more valid, but more to ask for than a simple test with 1 then 2 threads. regards, Anson
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.