Author: Günther Simon
Date: 02:14:07 07/20/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 20, 2005 at 04:44:47, Steve Glanzfeld wrote: >On July 20, 2005 at 04:19:26, Eduard Nemeth wrote: > >>English: what si in the first analysis by S9.1 wrong? > >The Nalimov tablebases do not take notice of any castling rules. (Also, they do >not take notice of the 50 moves draw rule.) > >Steve ...and even if tablebases would consider castling rules, they would of course consider _normal_ chess castling rules only (otherwise two different sets of tablebases would be needed). Guenther
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.