Author: Uri Blass
Date: 02:18:16 07/20/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 20, 2005 at 04:44:47, Steve Glanzfeld wrote: >On July 20, 2005 at 04:19:26, Eduard Nemeth wrote: > >>English: what si in the first analysis by S9.1 wrong? > >The Nalimov tablebases do not take notice of any castling rules. (Also, they do >not take notice of the 50 moves draw rule.) > >Steve This is not relevant. programs should not use tablebases if castling is legal and they can probe tablebases only when it is clear that castling is illegal future positions relative to the position that is a candidate to be probeed by the tablebases. After castling ,castling is illegal so programs have no problem to see the win if they probe tablebases not at the root. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.