Author: Steve Glanzfeld
Date: 02:25:01 07/20/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 20, 2005 at 05:18:16, Uri Blass wrote: >On July 20, 2005 at 04:44:47, Steve Glanzfeld wrote: > >>On July 20, 2005 at 04:19:26, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >> >>>English: what si in the first analysis by S9.1 wrong? >> >>The Nalimov tablebases do not take notice of any castling rules. (Also, they do >>not take notice of the 50 moves draw rule.) >> >>Steve > >This is not relevant. Obviously it is very relevant!! :-)) Steve
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.