Author: Uri Blass
Date: 07:59:52 07/21/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 21, 2005 at 10:51:02, Steve Glanzfeld wrote: >On July 21, 2005 at 09:52:07, Eduard Nemeth wrote: > >>Somit wird gegen Shredder 9.1 gewertet (wenn man sich nach Regeln hält ? :-) >>und Shredder hat diese Partie dann verloren! >> >>Nicht wahr? > >I'm not sure. You may have noticed that there was a rule that progs have to >provide X-FEN, in the Mainz Chess960 computer championship. Then, Shredder >presented another format. What happened? The rule was immediatly changed to >allow Shredder's format. Responsible AFAIK Ingo Althoefer. > >http://f51.parsimony.net/forum204700/messages/60.htm > >When Shredder thinks the 100th ply after 99 plies compliant with the 50 move >rule can be a pawn move and still it's a draw, who knows? Maybe organizers will >tolerate that as well and ignore the old FIDE rules. There is a big difference. different notation does not change the result of the game. claiming a draw after 99 plies by making a pawn move changes the result of the game. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.