Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: To Pablo Ignacio Restrepo

Author: Hristo

Date: 12:54:54 07/23/05

Go up one level in this thread


On July 23, 2005 at 15:42:33, Jorge Pichard wrote:

>On July 23, 2005 at 14:33:17, Eduard Nemeth wrote:
>
>>On July 23, 2005 at 12:30:52, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>
>>>Pablo can you beat Baron-FRC or Pharaon-FRC normally without using AntiChess?
>>
>>Hello Jorge!
>>
>>I am not Pablo, but in my opinion, eyerybody can use that Chess Strategy that is
>>for him the best.
>>
>>If Garry play tactical, that is Ok
>>If Kramnik play a posinional Staregy, that is OK
>>
>>If Eduard Nemeth play Anti Computerchess, that is OK
>>
>>
>>If Pablo Restrepo play Anti-Chess, that is OK!
>>
>>German: jedem das seine OK? Danke!
>>
>>>I
>>>now that you and Edward consider beating a program with AntiChess as an art, but
>>>at the same time it is boring.
>>
>>German: völlig uninteressant! ich bin kein Kasparov ich bin ich, aber evtl. kann
>>ich doch gegen Computer besser als Kasparov (?), auf meine Art, die dann
>>auch respektiert werden sollte.
>>
>>Schach ermöglichst viele Strategieformen.
>>
>>Jeder Mensch ist anders.
>>
>>Und jeder Mensch spielt gegen Computer anders!
>>
>>Ich spiele das was ich kann. :-)
>>
>>Und, ich finde es funktioniert ganz gut.
>>
>>Eduard.
>>
>>PS: Ich habe nur Shredder 9.1 als FRC Engine, und SMIRF. Ich kann auch gegen
>>SMIRF spielen, OK? Andere Engines habe ich noch nicht, aber wenn es welche in
>>Shredder 9.1  UCI geben wird, dass müssen diese Engines sich warm anziehen! :-)
>>
>>
>>>
>>>Please post a Chess960 game where you have beating Baron 1.6.1 playing Normally.
>>>
>>>Jorge
>
>German: completely uninteresting! I am not Kasparov I am I, but possibly I can
>nevertheless against computers be better than Kasparov (?), in my kind, which
>should be also respected then.
>
>I do respect your way of playing Antichess, but you restrict any program from
>playing to the very end, simply by NOT exchanging pawns, and instead creating a
>pawns Wall, and NOT allowing the computer to play the most exciting part of
>chess which is the ending.
>
>I can also box against the World Boxing Champion, if I run around the ring for
>12 rounds; but I will need a boxing ring the size of a tennis court. Now who is
>interested in watching such a match if I don't give the boxer a chance to touch
>me?

I would watch you run around and wait for the moment you get "clocked" once and
fly across the entire ring. :-)
In fact this would be much more interesting than seeing a bunch of people,
thrown into a regulation boxing ring and getting knocked-out without even having
a chance to run around. I mean, what is the fun in watching Adams getting
dismembered like a regular patzer?

Regards,
Hristo

>
>Jorge
>
>
>Chess makes many strategy forms possible. Each human is different. And each
>human play against computers differently! I play which I can: -) And, I find it
>functioned completely good. Eduard. HP: I have only Shredder 9,1 as FRC engines,
>and SMIRF. I can play also against SMIRF, OK ONE? I do not have other Engines
>yet, but if it which in Shredder 9,1 UCI will give that it must dress this
>Engines warmly! : -)
>
>Eduard.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.