Author: Pablo Ignacio Restrepo
Date: 22:34:41 07/23/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 23, 2005 at 12:30:52, Jorge Pichard wrote: >Pablo can you beat Baron-FRC or Pharaon-FRC normally without using AntiChess? I >now that you and Edward consider beating a program with AntiChess as an art, but >at the same time it is boring. > >Please post a Chess960 game where you have beating Baron 1.6.1 playing Normally. > >Jorge Hello Jorge. I am agreeing with Eduard Nemeth concept. But, if you could listen GMs usually they are going to say: To win on time not count. A G.M. brain and academic formation is based in a way playing seeking the victories. I am resting now the antichess battle, and making puzzles, making by myself better as a human being chess player. Why I am making that? Because I am going to beat the top engines again if God get to me energy again, and because I am very tired playing engines. A G.M. from Russia said to me yesterday that is a good idea that I am back in the chess again. He said to me that I have won on time not count. I am not agree…of course that it count too. But he has the reason> Great for me back to the chess again. Like Eduard Nemeth have said… everyone can play as everyone like to play. Now ….the answer… It is possible for me too, some times beat engines in normal chess too…but of course in a few opportunities. But I have said…Game over………….….Engines 1 human beings 0. Is the end of the chess? Now, how can a human being be a better chess player? Making many puzzles Jorge… Making a Job of 1-2 hours per day solving chess puzzles at lest during 4 years. Mate in 1, 2 3, etc. like Polgar book puzzles. But …… How must a human being play to beat engines, sincerely, I think that the antichess is the best way today. All last words have been writing in my simple humble opinion Jorge. Everyone have his/her own concept. It is respectable. Best, Pablo
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.