Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 09:47:40 02/19/99
Go up one level in this thread
On February 18, 1999 at 22:23:26, greg moller wrote: >Why wasn't the match played with small increments ?? Seems to me that the icc is >tailor-made for that. Of course it would help the human, but shouldn't the >quality of play be held in high regard ? >This way all we had was a glorified blitz match. Time shouldn't play such a huge >factor. I think most of us know that computers are now better than humans at >sudden-death time controls. A wasted opportunity, yet again :-( 30 0 is a standard time control, and by that I mean that regular tournaments are held at that time control. It's faster than 40/2, but it's not blitz by any stretch. If ICC wants to do an increment match I'd be happy to volunteer to participate. bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.