Author: Eelco de Groot
Date: 18:08:43 07/24/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 24, 2005 at 19:16:26, Ed Schröder wrote:
>On July 24, 2005 at 18:05:37, Bertil Eklund wrote:
>
>>On July 24, 2005 at 17:41:40, Ed Schröder wrote:
>>
>>>On July 24, 2005 at 16:22:43, Thoralf Karlsson wrote:
>>>
>>>>On July 24, 2005 at 16:03:09, Joshua Lee wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>When is the next list possibly coming out?
>>>>
>>>>Most likely in 7-10 days. There will be three new entrants.
>>>>
>>>>Thoralf Karlsson
>>>
>>>
>>>Hi Thoralf,
>>>
>>>Is Fruit 2.1 one of those three?
>>>
>>>Ed
>
>>No, if I don´t missed everything during my vacation, but ProDeo1.1 are one of
>>them.
>
>Okay. But will you simmer Fruit 2.1 on the next SSDF barbecue? It's the most
>fascinating engine since Chess Tiger made its entry in the CC scene, IMO.
>
>Ed
Hallo Ed,
Fruit 2.1 presents quite a difficult challenge I think for all the programmers
to see if they are able to distill some of the strong characteristics of Fruit
2.1 for their own programs. But great that the source is available from Fabien,
that should make a difference, in due time!
Any luck with Windows 2000 and compiling Pro Deo with GCC (or was it another Gnu
compiler) Ed?
Also, I was wondering Ed do you have any idea if this (from
http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?437706) could be a position where
Pro Deo 1.1 is doing a bit too much pruning? Or could it possibly be a history
reduction thing?
Pro Deo 1.1 default is doing better here than Vulcan {9k9i} but also wants to
sac the knight at move 31 at first.
[D]7r/1kpr1p2/1p4p1/p6n/3pPP1N/3P1K2/PP1R3P/6R1 w - - 2 1
Pro Deo 1.1 default
00:35:52.4 0,00 17 2840425533 f5 Nf6 Nxg6 fxg6 Rxg6 Re7 Rxf6 Rh4
Vulcan {9k9n4}(={9k9i} with small end1 change) after 29..Rh8,
I waited for the 18 ply result, finally it got in but unfortunately 30.f5 did
not remain best choice... there was no fail-low high, so I think one of the
extensions must have take so much time to get to 18 ply..
00:00:00.2 -1,39 1 10 Nf5 gxf5
00:00:00.2 0,80 1 18 Nxg6 fxg6 Rxg6
00:00:00.2 0,72 2 300 Nxg6 fxg6 Rxg6 c6
00:00:00.2 0,97 3 1090 Nxg6 fxg6 Rxg6 c6 Re2
00:00:00.2 0,74 4 4976 Nxg6 fxg6 Rxg6 Rf7 f5 Re7
00:00:00.2 0,91 5 12613 Nxg6 fxg6 Rxg6 Rf8 f5 Re7
00:00:00.3 0,79 6 35493 Nxg6 fxg6 Rxg6 c5 Kg4 b5 Rf2
00:00:00.4 0,80 7 174180 Nxg6 fxg6 Rxg6 c6 a4 Rf7 f5 Re7 Re2
00:00:00.7 0,82 8 466721 Nxg6 fxg6 Rxg6 c5 a4 Rf7 f5 Re7 Rdg2 Rhe8
00:00:01.4 0,76 9 1240208 Nxg6 fxg6 Rxg6 Rd6 Rxd6 cxd6 Rg2 Rh6 f5 Nf6
00:00:03.3 0,84 10 3353772 Nxg6 fxg6 Rxg6 c5 f5 Re7 Re2 c4 dxc4 Rd8 Rd2 a4
00:00:11.0 0,82 11 12137021 Nxg6 fxg6 Rxg6 Rf7 f5 Nf6 Kf4 Nd7 Rdg2 Rh4+ R6g4 Rg7
h3 c6
00:00:20.8 0,65 12 23729589 Nxg6 fxg6 Rxg6 Rf7 f5 Nf6 Kf4 Nd7 Rdg2 Rh4+ R6g4 Rg7
h3 Rgh7 e5
00:00:38.5 0,50 13 45049989 Nxg6 fxg6 Rxg6 Rf7 f5 Nf6 Kf4 Nd7 Rdg2 Rh4+ R6g4 Rh3
Rg7 Rh4+ R2g4 Rxg7 Rxh4
00:01:46.2 0,33 14 126634361 Nxg6 fxg6 Rxg6 Rf7 f5 Nf6 Kf4 Nd7 Re2 Rh4+ Kg3
00:04:11.6 0,37 14 302309239 f5 Nf6 Nxg6 fxg6 Rxg6 Rh3+
00:08:06.0 0,25 15 586163917 f5 Nf6 Nxg6 fxg6 Rxg6 Rh3+
00:08:25.5 0,25 15 610995968 Nxg6
00:20:04.7 0,33 15 1426988967 Nxg6 fxg6 Rxg6 Rf7 f5 Nf6 Kf4 Nd7 Rdg2 Rfh7
00:29:40.5 0,46 16 2129217741 Nxg6 fxg6 Rxg6 Rf7 f5 Nf6 Rdg2 Rh3+ R6g3 Rh4
00:48:53.3 0,12 17 3535091112 Nxg6 fxg6 Rxg6 Rf7 f5 Rd7 Rdg2
01:00:29.8 0,14 17 111258939 f5 Nf6 Nxg6 fxg6 Rxg6 Rf7
07:39:27.2 0,03 18 179091161 f5 Nf6 Nxg6
07:46:56.7 0,26 18 776770202 Nxg6 fxg6 Rxg6 Rf7
Not terribly important Ed, just one position, but I'm keeping it as a
testposition for end1 endgames I think.
Groeten, Eelco
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.