Author: Tomas Casanovas Martinez
Date: 04:56:31 07/25/05
Go up one level in this thread
Thanks Tom! I will follow your indications. Regards, Tom Casanovas On July 25, 2005 at 07:34:30, Thomas Logan wrote: >On July 25, 2005 at 05:51:54, Tomas Casanovas Martinez wrote: > >>Here you have two results in a short and medium time games: >> >>1.- Game in 10 minuts. >> >>Deep Shredder 9.1 - Shredder 9 +28 =50 -22 >>53% to 47% >> >>One question, please: Given that in my computer Deep Shredder 9.1 runs 40% >>faster than Shredder 9, I would like to know whether the reported results are >>(or can be) consistent with the hypothesis that the strenght of both programmes >>is roughly the same. (I know that the time of the games and the not sufficient >>number of them does not allow a statistically reliable answer to my question). I >>ask only for your 'feelings', please. >> >>2.- Game: 50 moves in 15 minutes + finish in 20 additional minutes. >> >>Deep Shredder 9.1 - Fruit 2.1 (With Junior 9 book) +7 =7 -6 >>52,5% to 47,5% >> >>I have been simply astonished by the excellent performance of Fruit 2.1. What an >>amazing amateur (free!!!!) program!. >> >>I will try to discover how to run Fruit's own book. >> >>Regards, >> >>Tom Casanovas >>Barcelona - Spain. > >Hi If you are using chessbase gui create a book with no moves in it. > >Make sure you have use own book checked in fruit's engine parameters > >Tom
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.