Author: Madhavan
Date: 05:30:15 07/25/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 25, 2005 at 07:04:35, Madhavan wrote: >On July 25, 2005 at 03:57:50, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On July 25, 2005 at 03:47:13, Andre van Ark wrote: >> >>>Hi, >>> >>>Fabien has the advantage that he could learn from postings and experiences from >>>other programmers and make use of existing programs like Crafty. >>> >>>The "programmers of the 90's" had to find out "the weel" by themselves, and that >>>consumes a lot of time. >>> >>>Nevertheless, I take my hat off for Letouzey, and off course also all other >>>chessprogrammers. >>> >>>André >> >>Fabien could learn from other programmers but the same for the commercial >>programmers and I do not see big improvement in programs like Tiger2004 or Deep >>Sjeng or Ruffian that are near the level of Fruit2 and not near the level of >>Fruit2.1 >> >>I also believe that next fruit will be stronger than Shredder9(I do not say that >>it will be stronger than next Shredder but of course SMK can learn from Fruit >>when Fabien cannot learn from Shredder). > >It's better that Fabien keep the next release source code private,Isn't it legal >to do according to GPL license? > >once released a open source and keep the next source cde release private? >It doesn't make sense by always releasing all version source codes. >It only applies to old programmers and not to middle aged mens,Fabien is 32 >something.It's better that he keeps fruit code private,I don't know if fabien >profits money by releasing open source codes,I should you ask you this >Does Hyatt profit from Crafty and Cray Blitz?or is he doing these fields as an >hobby? > >If he can't profit from releasing such a strong program wth great chess code,I >don't understand why he'd do that,Is it that he wants to be popular among the >chess community? > > > >>Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.