Author: F. Huber
Date: 15:05:52 07/27/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 27, 2005 at 17:46:22, Reinhard Scharnagl wrote: >On July 27, 2005 at 15:28:33, Joseph Tadeusz wrote: > >>One point of view is that Steven Edwards made a mistake by choosing the >>inflexible KQ notation for FEN, wich has now been corrected by SMK. >> >>What you do with X-FEN is a workaround wich can lead to abberations like >> >> KgQbkgqc > >impossible in played games. Show me one game with three equal colored rooks. "impossible" is actually WRONG - "improbable" would be the correct word! >There are less than 1/1000000 of positions having an inner castling enabled rook >alone, so such constructable positions are even more irrelevant. "irrelevant"? Well, 1/1000000 of all possible chess positions (about 10^38 IIRC) are still quite a lot! You see: NONE of your arguments really convince ANYONE! Franz.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.