Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 02:26:39 07/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 28, 2005 at 02:23:28, Madhavan wrote: >On July 28, 2005 at 01:48:57, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On July 28, 2005 at 00:44:22, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>... frankly spoken: I am like many other people >>>not at all interested in FRC (Chess960) and so >>>we do not bother about implementation of FRC in >>>chess programs. Can you imagine that FRC will >>>ever become so popular like classical chess? >>>I do not understand the big noise about this -:) >>>Regards >>>Kurt >> >> >>Frankly Spoken: the more I play FRC the more >>interested I become, since classical Chess is >>only for those that have the time to study chess >>openings for more than 3 hours a day. I remember >>back when I started to play in tournament, I realized >>that only those that had the time available were the >>one that really progressed at chess, since I like other >>grown up who had a real job did NOT had the time available >>to come back from work and study opening for three to four >>hours daily. Now with FRC I can even challenge players that >> are rated 200 rating points higher due to not having to memorize >>openings. I just played 10 friendly games with a friend rated around >>2100 by the USCF and he lost 6 games to me. He admitted that not knowing >>what to do from the very opening was hard for him, and I reminded him that >>that was the reason that I never progressed 10 years ago in chess. >> >>PS: I didn't tell him that I studied more than 10 books since I left from >>playing in tournaments, but none were Openings books, Just strategies, tactics, >>and endings. > >Your writing style here remind me of Naum's[engine] evaluations,the way how it >evaluates? > >.. >... >.... >..... >...... > >Which engines evaluates like the above? > >:-) > >>Jorge Only Jorge's brain or Jorge's engine :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.