Author: George Tsavdaris
Date: 04:56:54 07/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 28, 2005 at 00:44:22, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >... frankly spoken: I am like many other people >not at all interested in FRC (Chess960) and so >we do not bother about implementation of FRC in >chess programs. But there are many other that are interested. I was like you and in fact i didn't want to listen for FRC at all, but when i started playing it or watching programs play it, i discovered that what it fascinates me at Chess, the tactical attacking games, happen at FRC much more frequently. People should pay a little more attention to some Chess variants and forget thinking like: "Chess is the best and played for hundreds of years, so forget everything else!" I was even disgusted with the idea of playing FRC, but now i'm completely in the other side.......... Can you imagine that FRC will >ever become so popular like classical chess? >I do not understand the big noise about this -:) This is not critical at all. It doesn't matter. Does FRC has to reach Chess popularity to start people playing it? I don't think so. We have Chess as the king, but this should not prevent us playing more games and especially FRC that is Chess with more fire on the board.......... >Regards >Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.