Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 06:11:50 07/30/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 30, 2005 at 04:41:27, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On July 29, 2005 at 17:59:40, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On July 29, 2005 at 17:47:47, Steve Glanzfeld wrote: >> >>The second post was posted aproximately 2 hours later and since Eduard at that >>time did not sent me a WON game, I posted a second post indicating my >>conditions. Eduard didn't answered until several hours later anyway, indicating >>that he read my second post, and started playing 4 hours after my second post. >> >>Jorge > > >Sorry, but this reasoning has a flaw. And the reason is simply that Eduard knows >not to read the English so that he could impossibly get what you had said >exactly. You knew that. And that is the reason why your whole proceduring is >wrong. Also bcause you colored your messages with a lot of smilies. But let me >ask you without any assaults: did you ever reflect that Eduard would take your >first message completely for serious? And shouldn't you therefore grant him at >least a minimum of your bet? Apparently you are not getting my message, Eduard did not win the first game, it was a draw. Which means that if he didn't managed to win the second game as he did, he will still be trying. And how hong do you think I should have waited? With unlimited attempts? Jorge > >And finally: will you stand here with your status being hurt and looking like >someone whose words one couldn't believe? > >To all: > >Couldn't we let organise Steven, our host, this on the base of his paypal >incomes? For the sake of humanitarian grounds? > > >Rolf
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.