Author: George Tsavdaris
Date: 14:48:19 07/30/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 30, 2005 at 06:01:06, Drexel,Michael wrote: > >...at all with this time controls and hardware used? No we can't! The list says the follwing about S9-UCI and S8-CB: S9-UCI has a rating that with a 95% probability it is between 2821-27 and 2821+28 that means: S9-UCI has a rating that with a 95% probability it is between 2794 and 2849 S8-CB has a rating that with a 95% probability it is between 2805-22 and 2805+23 that means: S8-CB has a rating that with a 95% probability it is between 2783 and 2828 So it is clear that S9-UCI CAN actually be even by 2849-2783 = 66 ELO points stronger than S8-CB.......... But not only this. There is a 5% probability that S9-UCI can be X points stronger or weaker than S8-CB and this X can be any positive number........ > >http://chessprogramming.org/cccsearch/ccc.php?art_id=364117 > >Sandro claimed Shredder8.bkt and more effective learning should increase the >rating by about 35 points over Shredder 8 CB. Well, at the aforementioned link i just see a claim that S8-UCI on Shredder Classic GUI, will be stronger from S8 at Chessbase GUI due to better learning and better book, with 35 ELO. I don't see the same claim about S9-UCI and S8-CB. Why this ELO increase has to be valid with these new version also......?!?!? > >Michael
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.