Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 01:52:44 07/31/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 30, 2005 at 17:48:19, George Tsavdaris wrote: >On July 30, 2005 at 06:01:06, Drexel,Michael wrote: > >> >>...at all with this time controls and hardware used? > >No we can't! > >The list says the follwing about S9-UCI and S8-CB: > >S9-UCI has a rating that with a 95% probability it is between 2821-27 and >2821+28 >that means: >S9-UCI has a rating that with a 95% probability it is between 2794 and 2849 > >S8-CB has a rating that with a 95% probability it is between 2805-22 and 2805+23 >that means: >S8-CB has a rating that with a 95% probability it is between 2783 and 2828 > > > So it is clear that S9-UCI CAN actually be even by 2849-2783 = 66 ELO points >stronger than S8-CB.......... > But not only this. There is a 5% probability that S9-UCI can be X points >stronger or weaker than S8-CB and this X can be any positive number........ What's all this good for? We all know about the meaning of SSDF ratings. >>http://chessprogramming.org/cccsearch/ccc.php?art_id=364117 >> >>Sandro claimed Shredder8.bkt and more effective learning should increase the >>rating by about 35 points over Shredder 8 CB. > > Well, at the aforementioned link i just see a claim that S8-UCI on Shredder >Classic GUI, will be stronger from S8 at Chessbase GUI due to better learning >and better book, with 35 ELO. I don't see the same claim about S9-UCI and S8-CB. >Why this ELO increase has to be valid with these new version also......?!?!? Ever heared about logic?? Shredder 8 CB has a rating of 2805 and Shredder 8 UCI is supposed to be about 35 ELO stronger. Shredder 9 UCI has a rating of 2821. Is it likely that Shredder 9 UCI is stronger than Shredder 8 UCI then? Michael >> >>Michael
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.