Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Reply at the "So we can conclude: Shredder 9 UCI....."

Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto

Date: 18:45:45 07/31/05

Go up one level in this thread


On July 31, 2005 at 20:02:19, George Tsavdaris wrote:

>>On July 31, 2005 at 19:17:47, Uri Blass wrote:
>>
>>I think that there is one problem that prevent accurate rating for Shredder.
>>Programs need to play also against stronger opponents to get accurate
>>rating(otherwise players who are stronger against weaker opponents but weaker
>>against stronger opponents never meat the stronger opponents and get too high
>>rating).
>
>Very nice observation.......!
> And we have even more on this: Some SSDF-list engines have become so old that
>the newer Shredder versions (and Junior/Fritz) are crushing them by
>36-4,35.5-4.5,37-3. And this leads to many inaccuracies on the caclulated ELO of
>the stronger engines, as these results are almost worthless for the
>determination of how stronger a new version has become over its
>predecessor......
>
> With the exploding evolution of the number of new Chess engines, it's obvious
>that SSDF(that has to play hundreds of games and with classic time controls too)
>can't follow, so the list more and more becomes, less accurate at the higher
>levels.........

I don't see how A follows from B here.

The SSDF could let the strongest engines play more games against each other
rather than against weaker engines.

The time control is of zero relevance.

--
GCP



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.