Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 02:50:54 08/02/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 02, 2005 at 05:25:45, Andreas Stabel wrote: >Do you know if this was done explicitely to stop the opponent from predicting >the move ? no. in all cases it had nothing to do with stopping PB. the idea of genius was: having an advantage over normal search based programs doing NORMAL searches and not coming that deep . it was good enough for 10 titles of richard lang. with CSTAL the idea was to make a chess program that plays interesting. >Wouldn't this technique also cause Genius and CSTal to not predict the opponents >moves in a lot of cases ? > >Regards >Andreas genius forces opponents often to compute from sero and CSTAL WAS often forced by opponent to begin with sero when. IMO there is no need for a chess program always to play the BEST move. it would make more sense to play moves that lead to a plan, instead of trying to SOLVE the positions of a game as a single position .
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.