Author: Roger Brown
Date: 08:32:17 08/02/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 02, 2005 at 11:12:21, WAEL DEEB wrote: >Even though the result is showing the priority of Schnappy's opening book,it's >I will make more comments later,but the information will be restricted because I >don't want to help Schnappy improving his opening book :-) > >Dr.Wael Deeb > >P.S.I will insult badly any idiotic or provocative post which is not related to >the post's data.........You can comment and say your opinion,but don't insult >me.... Hello Dr. Wael Deeb, I am not commenting on the merits or demerits of one book versus the other. I hope my post is not deemed idiotic or provocative but if it is so be it... Schnappy is an **insulting** version of the man's name. Further, it is patronising, belittling and totally unbecoming. Perhaps it is acceptable these days to insult someone you do not like but is does nothing for your own profile...or indeed for promoting your book. Criticise the lines in his book all you like. That can only improve his and any other offering out there but leave the man out of it. Please feel free to insult me or my post as badly as you like. Later.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.