Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Fun Rating List......Fruit 2.1

Author: Chessfun

Date: 08:53:39 08/02/05

Go up one level in this thread


On August 02, 2005 at 09:21:52, Günther Simon wrote:

>On August 02, 2005 at 08:10:09, Dom Leste wrote:
>
>>We see the importance of a good book here with fruit.
>
>Why? -> hint: count the Fritz, Shredder and Junior entries
>and do some stats about the chnace a single Fruit has
>to surpass them. We have no idea what would have happened with
>5-7 Fruit entries. Moreover there are just 210 games played by Fruit 2.1.
>
>Guenther

I don't see myself what difference if you call the other engines A-Z. Shredder 9
for example was also new when tested and overcome the same things you mention.

As for the quantity from past experience it will be within the error margin + -
and as we know playing even 1200 games would still leave probably + - 20 rating
points.

The book naturally could cause a large difference in rating. I will at some
point re-test Fruit 2.1 using Dann's big book.

Sarah.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.