Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Fun Rating List......Fruit 2.1

Author: Matthias Gemuh

Date: 11:40:53 08/02/05

Go up one level in this thread


On August 02, 2005 at 12:57:39, Günther Simon wrote:
>>>
>>>Guenther
>>
>>I don't see myself what difference if you call the other engines A-Z. Shredder 9
>>for example was also new when tested and overcome the same things you mention.
>>
>>As for the quantity from past experience it will be within the error margin + -
>>and as we know playing even 1200 games would still leave probably + - 20 rating
>>points.
>>
>>The book naturally could cause a large difference in rating. I will at some
>>point re-test Fruit 2.1 using Dann's big book.
>>
>>Sarah.
>
>
>I just want to add that Fruit 2.1 is anyway still within the error bars
>of place number 1. (So book conclusions are much too soon)
>For having included multiple versions of programs against a single one,
>just search the forum, Dann Corbit e.g. explained it several times...
>(Imagine e.g. what happens if Fruit doesn't like especially Fritz versions)
>
>Guenther




Hi Guenter,
it is obvious that the more identical Fruits join the battle, the higher the
chances that a Fruit will be the champ !
Of course, the chanes may also increase that another Fruit is last in this
strong field.
Best,
Matthias.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.