Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: One Reply Extension

Author: Will Singleton

Date: 19:03:33 02/20/99

Go up one level in this thread


On February 20, 1999 at 21:31:13, Nobuhiro Yoshimura wrote:

>I have a question for how other programmers are  implementing it.
>When we use iterative-deeping and transposition table, it is very likely
>to get a good move from a hash table.   Since we get the move without
>calling a move-generator and start searching, I have no idea whether or
>not the node has only one move.
>
>How do you know ?
>Do you call a special check routine in order to know the node has a sinlge move
>when king in check?


I was just going to address this issue in my program, so I'm glad you brought it
up.  I use pseudo-moves to get out of check (king-moves and interposes), so I
don't know whether there's one reply or not.  So I'm thinking of changing back
to the way I used to do it, which is a special get-out-of-check routine that
only gives legal moves.  I thought it was slow, but maybe it will be worthwhile.

But I don't allow hash probes when in check (or killers or anything else), so I
always call the generator.  If your generator gives legal rather than
pseudo-legal, then you might try that.

Will



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.