Author: Henrik Dinesen
Date: 11:20:38 08/03/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 03, 2005 at 01:11:03, Peter Skinner wrote: >On August 02, 2005 at 23:39:47, Tanya Deborah wrote: > >>Hi to all! >> >>I will like to test this engine against the best free programs. It seems that >>Fruit had very good results against the strongest programs and it hear very >>interesting for me. >> >>Do you think that Fruit 2.1 is clearly better than Ruffian or the last Crafty >>version? >> >>Can we call this engine the strongest free program in this moment?? How much >>diference?? >> >>For the author of this engine, I contratulate him to offer a great engine like >>Fruit. There are no many programmers in the world, that give us a great gift >>like this! >> >> My Best regards >> >> Tanya Deborah. > >The only problem with Fruit that I can see is that it doesn't learn. > >Someone else complained about this, and it has shown losses by identical games >before. > >I believe that Fabien is working on the learning before the SSDF tests it. > >Peter I might ad MultiPV for analysis. Both when using Infinite analysis in general, as well as Deep Position Analysis in Chessprogram8, and when using some analysis features in ChessAssitant 8, MPV may either represents a significant improvemnt or it's neccesary. Though, when analysing, the use of various engines is always a good idea. Henrik
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.