Author: John Brownlee
Date: 18:34:08 08/03/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 03, 2005 at 20:15:40, David Dahlem wrote: >On August 03, 2005 at 19:30:08, John Brownlee wrote: > >>Hi Tanya, >> >>My laptop is currently 3000 games into a 5280 game tournament among 33 engines. >> (Shredder8 + 32 free engines) >>GUI is Arena. >>Time control is 40/20 repeating. >>All use same opening book d-grafen-v01__asb.abk >> (downloaded many moons ago from Arena website) >>3/4 man endgame tablebases are available for engines. >> (not all support their use) >>Hardware is Athlon XP 1.5 GHz >> >>The top 9 engines at this point in the tournament have made a breakaway >> from the rest of the pack. >> >>Standings so far: >>1. Shredder8 (not free) 140.5/181 >>2. Spike 127.5/180 >>3. Prodeo 121.5/181 >>4. Fruit 118.5/182 >>5. Ruffian 1.05 118.5/181 >>6. List512 116.0/181 >>7. Slowchess 114.0/181 >>8. Aristarch 4.50 111.5/182 >>9. Pharaon 111.0/181 >> >>10. SOS 100.0/181 >>11-32. Other engines with scores between SOS and Averno >>33. Averno 37.0/182 >> >>I only upgraded to Fruit 2.1 about 6 weeks ago. So only about 40 of Fruit's >>games have been with Fruit 2.1. Others may be a mix of 1.5 and 2.0, but mostly >>2.0 I think. > >There is a HUGE strength difference between Fruit 2.1 and Fruit 2.0. Mixing >games between different versions doesn't give an accurate strength determination >of either version. :-) > >Regards >Dave Hi Dave, You are correct. I will delete/replace Fruit in the tournament so after a week or so of gauntletting to catch up the number of games to the rest of the tournament players, I will have new results that will be pure Fruit2.1. Regards, John
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.