Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 02:52:39 08/04/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 04, 2005 at 05:32:40, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>On August 04, 2005 at 03:07:07, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>On August 04, 2005 at 02:15:12, Terry McCracken wrote:
>>
>>>On August 03, 2005 at 23:19:55, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>>
>>>>http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=2556
>>>>
>>>>In Chess960 the advantage for players who do a lot of homework on openings is
>>>>reduced to a minimum. “Therefore I think that this variant has good chances to
>>>>become a serious alternative in the long run”, Lobron explains. Therefore, it is
>>>>not really necessary to train for Chess960 before the tournament.
>>>
>>>960 chess will be pass away as women's hats.
>>>
>>>960 isn't _true_ chess.
>>
>> Hi Terry
>> I fully agree.
>> Kurt
>
>I totally disagree, more chessplayers that don't have 2 hours to study openings
>daily will become chess960 players. I would say that 90% of the average players
>who have real jobs and return home after working 8 hours will be the potential
>Chess960 lovers.
>
>
>JOrge
Hi Jorge
You don't have to study openings daily to have fun
with the classical chess ... and, and ... but time
will tell who is right -:)
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.