Author: gerold daniels
Date: 05:33:02 08/04/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 04, 2005 at 01:42:30, Juan Pablo Naar C. wrote: >On August 04, 2005 at 00:50:02, Reinhard Scharnagl wrote: > >>Hi Juan Pablo, >> >>> Reinhard, can you implement this variant to your protocol? I find it very >>> interesting and this could help improve any engine's positional understanding. >> >>I do not intend to change Smirf's lay out as a FullChess application, which is >>meaning to include variants compatibly including traditional chess. >> >>But I am working on the idea to enable insertions of blocking squares, that way >>giving a chance to reduce the size of the playable zone into different shapes. >> >>But actually the acceptance of the SMIRF idea is very low. A lot of people >>simultaneously are demanding Smirf to be freeware and try to characterize my >>ideas to be a sort of nonsense. That is not very motivating. >> >>Reinhard. > >Hi Reinhard, > >When will you finish your idea? I'm impatient to play my variant on SMIRF. Also, >when you sell SMIRF, i'll instantly buy it, I want to play my variaton :-) > >And I accept your idea of SMIRF being commercial, I would do that too, working >on chess variants algorithms and making them work is not an easy task and is >time consuming, don't let the other persons intimidate you, continue on your >great and unique project! > >Best Regards, > >Juan Pablo Naar I agree with your statement. Gerold.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.