Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 04:40:55 08/05/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 04, 2005 at 13:38:16, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On August 04, 2005 at 07:49:10, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On August 04, 2005 at 07:15:02, Engin Üstün wrote: >> >>>what is about the intelligence of the program? i mean the knowledge of the >>>program ? >> >>Well the competition in that respect has been closed already, >>as diep has more chessevaluation knowledge than any other program. >> > > >That ought to be worth a "post of the year" award. "the competition is closed". > :) Just like the question "can a cluster be used to play chess?" The answer >was (at first) "No, I can proof that the latencies are too high and the speedup >can't be > 1.0". It was later "yes, everyone else has tried and failed, but >Diep can use a cluster now." > >that gets _so_ old to continually read such crap. > >Why is it that the program "with more chessevaluation knowledge than any other >program" can't win a major tournament with the regularity of the inferior >programs like Shredder and Junior? > >Go figure... Are you suggesting that Shredder has less evaluation knowledge than Crafty? Go away. Shredder has *way* more than you realize. Junior9 has way way more knowledge than older versions. The proof is obvious that chessknowledge works.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.