Author: Uri Blass
Date: 08:03:10 08/05/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 05, 2005 at 07:40:55, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On August 04, 2005 at 13:38:16, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On August 04, 2005 at 07:49:10, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On August 04, 2005 at 07:15:02, Engin Üstün wrote: >>> >>>>what is about the intelligence of the program? i mean the knowledge of the >>>>program ? >>> >>>Well the competition in that respect has been closed already, >>>as diep has more chessevaluation knowledge than any other program. >>> >> >> >>That ought to be worth a "post of the year" award. "the competition is closed". >> :) Just like the question "can a cluster be used to play chess?" The answer >>was (at first) "No, I can proof that the latencies are too high and the speedup >>can't be > 1.0". It was later "yes, everyone else has tried and failed, but >>Diep can use a cluster now." >> >>that gets _so_ old to continually read such crap. >> >>Why is it that the program "with more chessevaluation knowledge than any other >>program" can't win a major tournament with the regularity of the inferior >>programs like Shredder and Junior? >> >>Go figure... > >Are you suggesting that Shredder has less evaluation knowledge than Crafty? > >Go away. No Bob Hyatt never said that Crafty has more knowledge. > >Shredder has *way* more than you realize. >Junior9 has way way more knowledge than older versions. > >The proof is obvious that chessknowledge works. Bob never said that chess knowledge does not work. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.