Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 08:40:26 08/05/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 05, 2005 at 11:03:10, Uri Blass wrote: >On August 05, 2005 at 07:40:55, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On August 04, 2005 at 13:38:16, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On August 04, 2005 at 07:49:10, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>> >>>>On August 04, 2005 at 07:15:02, Engin Üstün wrote: >>>> >>>>>what is about the intelligence of the program? i mean the knowledge of the >>>>>program ? >>>> >>>>Well the competition in that respect has been closed already, >>>>as diep has more chessevaluation knowledge than any other program. >>>> >>> >>> >>>That ought to be worth a "post of the year" award. "the competition is closed". >>> :) Just like the question "can a cluster be used to play chess?" The answer >>>was (at first) "No, I can proof that the latencies are too high and the speedup >>>can't be > 1.0". It was later "yes, everyone else has tried and failed, but >>>Diep can use a cluster now." >>> >>>that gets _so_ old to continually read such crap. >>> >>>Why is it that the program "with more chessevaluation knowledge than any other >>>program" can't win a major tournament with the regularity of the inferior >>>programs like Shredder and Junior? >>> >>>Go figure... >> >>Are you suggesting that Shredder has less evaluation knowledge than Crafty? >> >>Go away. > >No > >Bob Hyatt never said that Crafty has more knowledge. >> >>Shredder has *way* more than you realize. >>Junior9 has way way more knowledge than older versions. >> >>The proof is obvious that chessknowledge works. > >Bob never said that chess knowledge does not work. > >Uri By the way, has your 2000 line evaluation function "enough to get world champion" already finished? Vincent
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.