Author: Darrel Briley
Date: 23:14:31 08/05/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 05, 2005 at 22:15:06, Dann Corbit wrote:
>In the SSDF list, the highest rated CT version is CT 2004, but it gets very
>little attention from testers. I have seen lots and lots of tests with CT 15
>and CT 15, but CT 2004 seems to get ignored. I am curious as to why this is so.
>
> THE SSDF RATING LIST 2005-07-29 %102623 games played by 272 computers
> Rating + - Games Won Oppo
> ------ --- --- ----- --- ----
>...
> 15 Chess Tiger 2004 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2721 25 -25 791 58% 2665
> 17 Chess Tiger 14.0 CB 256MB Athlon 1200 2718 29 -28 597 60% 2648
> 18 Chess Tiger 15.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2717 21 -21 1129 57% 2669
>...
> 30 Chess Tiger 15.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2665 29 -30 557 48% 2681
>...
> 37 Chess Tiger 14.0 CB 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2636 23 -23 905 55% 2604
>...
> 48 Chess Tiger 12.0 DOS 128MB K6-2 450 2598 19 -19 1365 50% 2600
>...
> 91 Chess Tiger 11.8 Pentium 90 MHz 2384 43 -43 261 50% 2385
>...
>155 Chess Tiger 14.9 Palm m515 16MB 42MHz 2102 69 -74 100 39% 2181
CT2004 may be a more well-rounded engine, and thus very slightly stronger than
CT15, but it seems to me that CT15 has a more aggressive style that I like more.
DB
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.