Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 23:32:29 08/05/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 05, 2005 at 22:32:21, Steve Maughan wrote:
>Dann & Madhaven,
>
>IMO it's not the lack of Chessbase support - it's the lack of UCI support than
>results in little interest. If the products had been released as a UCI engine
>using the ChessPartner GUI it would have been well tested (e.g. Gandalf 6,
>Ruffian 2.1 and Sjeng 1.6).
>
>Regards,
>
>Steve
Hi Steve
You are right I think. I would surely have bought Chess Tiger 2004
as a UCI engine as I did with Shredder 9 purchased from SKM. But
I am no longer prepared to give money for an engine which is limited
to run under Chesspartner GUI. Lokasoft should overthink their
sales policiy or convince Christophe Théron to produce a UCI-engine.
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.