Author: Günther Simon
Date: 03:53:29 08/06/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 06, 2005 at 02:32:29, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>On August 05, 2005 at 22:32:21, Steve Maughan wrote:
>
>>Dann & Madhaven,
>>
>>IMO it's not the lack of Chessbase support - it's the lack of UCI support than
>>results in little interest. If the products had been released as a UCI engine
>>using the ChessPartner GUI it would have been well tested (e.g. Gandalf 6,
>>Ruffian 2.1 and Sjeng 1.6).
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Steve
>
> Hi Steve
> You are right I think. I would surely have bought Chess Tiger 2004
> as a UCI engine as I did with Shredder 9 purchased from SKM. But
> I am no longer prepared to give money for an engine which is limited
> to run under Chesspartner GUI.
...and under the Chessbase GUI :) (S9,)
Regards,
Guenther
Lokasoft should overthink their
> sales policiy or convince Christophe Théron to produce a UCI-engine.
> Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.