Author: Richard A. Fowell (fowell@netcom.com)
Date: 12:30:02 02/21/99
Go up one level in this thread
On February 21, 1999 at 11:02:36, Richard Harrison wrote: >Hello to all, > >None of the games are faked...that is ridiculous since I have no bias or >unstated interest in seeing either program win. I am and always have been a >HIARCS fan and I am surprised as anyone with the score after six games of 5-1 in >favor of CM6000. About duplicating the moves, H7 gets into major time crunches >towards the end of its alloted time sometimes having only minutes to complete >the last few moves. Plus with CM aggressive play, thinking on opponents time is >not always beneficial to H7 because the program does not anticipate the line >play. I also have the game scores from H7 which would dispell the notion that >it is not H7 playing. > >Why would anyone 'fake' games and then post them? That is so silly, I reserve >any comment on this subject. However based on the backlash towards CM6 over the >past three months or so on this message board, the fact that someone brought >this up does not surprise me. > >Rich Rich - if you could post the scores with the HIARCS analysis, that would be great. Thanks, Richard A. Fowell
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.