Author: Micheal Cummings
Date: 16:37:27 02/21/99
Go up one level in this thread
On February 21, 1999 at 07:59:42, Thom Perry wrote: >On February 21, 1999 at 03:03:28, Micheal Cummings wrote: > >> >>On February 21, 1999 at 02:29:58, ROBERT FLINT wrote: >> >>>i am a huge fans of the chessmaster programs and i owm 3000-6000 !!! and i think >>>that the king engine is one of the strongest engines out there !!BUT !!!!\\THESE >>>GAMES WERE IT SEEMS TO BE CRUSHING HIARCS7 IS TRUELY FOOLISH!! I HAVE TWO 450MHZ >>>PENTIUMII COMPUTERS AND AFTER RUNNING BOTH GAMES ON MY COMPUTERS WITH THE SAME >>>HARDWARE HIARCS PLAYS NONE OF THESE BLUNDERS. SO I BEGAN TO THINK ITS MUST BE >>>THE HARDWARE !! SO I WENT TO A FRIENDS HOUSE AND RAN THE SAME GAME ON A 166MHZ >>>CYRIX PROCESSOR AND AGAIN HIARCS7 DID NOT BLUNDER AND I FOUND ALL THE MISTAKES >>>!!! USING VERY LITTLE TIME !!! I URGE ALL HIARCS OWNERS TO FORGET THESE PATHETIC >>>GAMES AND LOOK TO MORE RELIABLE SOURCES!!! I AM SOORY IF I HURT ANY FEELING BUT >>>THESE ARE JUST NOT LEGIT!!! >> >> >>Which games are you referring too, the ones played by Richard Harrison are >>played on better machines than a 166Mhz, I think you just do not like to see >>Hiarcs7 lose, It the same old story crappy program beating a very expensive one. >>I think the games being played are legit. > >Why do you think the games are legit when it "appears" they cannot be >duplicated? Does your love of CM6K automatically make these games legit? No it does not, I do not have Hiarcs7 so I cannot tell, but I do have 2 PII 450's and would like to play them against each other. So basically what you are saying is that these games a freud games and made up, or that they are played either with wrong settings or the hardware setup is wrong. Very interesting so if this person is one of the main testers for the SSDF which I am not sure that is is or is not. Then you might have to assume that some other programs results were maybe incorrect. And that there is no policing of the games on the SSDF I might have to assume that the results for allot of the games might be misleading or wrong. That is why I say the SSDF is rubbish as it is now, and so too is the ranking of Hiarcs7, it surprised everyone that it made number one. And so it should there are much better programs out there and for quarter the price. Pretty sad actually. IMHO that is what is also funny is that since it topped the SSDF, everyone get a little shocked if it losses to another program. You guys just love jumping on the band wagon when something is on top, where were all these great predictions before the ratings came out. So least I always state that CM6K is one of the best. Lets see if it makes number one what all you guys say then. A few would get tiffed off and stick in what is wrong with it in whatever way and few would jump on the band wagon saying that it is the best. Its always they same
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.