Author: Micheal Cummings
Date: 16:43:23 02/21/99
Go up one level in this thread
On February 21, 1999 at 07:59:42, Thom Perry wrote: >On February 21, 1999 at 03:03:28, Micheal Cummings wrote: > >> >>On February 21, 1999 at 02:29:58, ROBERT FLINT wrote: >> >>>i am a huge fans of the chessmaster programs and i owm 3000-6000 !!! and i think >>>that the king engine is one of the strongest engines out there !!BUT !!!!\\THESE >>>GAMES WERE IT SEEMS TO BE CRUSHING HIARCS7 IS TRUELY FOOLISH!! I HAVE TWO 450MHZ >>>PENTIUMII COMPUTERS AND AFTER RUNNING BOTH GAMES ON MY COMPUTERS WITH THE SAME >>>HARDWARE HIARCS PLAYS NONE OF THESE BLUNDERS. SO I BEGAN TO THINK ITS MUST BE >>>THE HARDWARE !! SO I WENT TO A FRIENDS HOUSE AND RAN THE SAME GAME ON A 166MHZ >>>CYRIX PROCESSOR AND AGAIN HIARCS7 DID NOT BLUNDER AND I FOUND ALL THE MISTAKES >>>!!! USING VERY LITTLE TIME !!! I URGE ALL HIARCS OWNERS TO FORGET THESE PATHETIC >>>GAMES AND LOOK TO MORE RELIABLE SOURCES!!! I AM SOORY IF I HURT ANY FEELING BUT >>>THESE ARE JUST NOT LEGIT!!! >> >> >>Which games are you referring too, the ones played by Richard Harrison are >>played on better machines than a 166Mhz, I think you just do not like to see >>Hiarcs7 lose, It the same old story crappy program beating a very expensive one. >>I think the games being played are legit. > >Why do you think the games are legit when it "appears" they cannot be >duplicated? Does your love of CM6K automatically make these games legit? I also think the heading should of been Hiarcs7 fakes games, I do not believe the integrity of CM6K games is under question it is that played by Hiarcs, but maybe just your way of having a dig at CM6K, because even if this was not your intention, you just showed that you dislike it by the why you put it in the heading instead of Hiarcs7
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.